Supreme Court affirms validity of Section 16(2)(c): ITC is admissible only where the supplier has actually remitted tax to the Government, Provision held neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional

CESTAT upheld that no service tax is applicable on Refundable Advances and Sale of Self-Owned Flats is sale of immovable property and thus not Liable to Service Tax

Punjab High Court holds that mere uploading of notice/ order on ‘View Additional Notices and Orders’ cannot be treated as a valid mode of its service

Gujarat High Court holds that proceedings based on omitted Rule 89(4B) cannot survive in the absence of a saving clause

Calcutta High Court distinguishes between ‘issuance’ and ‘service’ of orders under section 73 of the GST Act, holding that the limitation period attaches to issuance, and not service of the order.